The honest version

Workday Learning does one job well: it keeps a clean, audit-ready record of who completed what, right next to worker data. That’s real. But a place to store completions is not a place where expertise spreads. This page is honest about both.

Who it was built for

Who Workday Learning was built for

If your learning problem is really a compliance-and-records problem inside Workday, it fits. Naming that is the point, because it’s also where the shape changes.

01

Existing Workday HCM customers

One login, one system. If you already run Workday HCM, learning lives next to worker data with no extra vendor.

02

Mandatory & compliance training

Assign it, make it due, track completion, keep the audit trail. Built for must-pass, all-employee training.

03

Records tied to HR data

Completions, certifications, and skills sit against the employee record for reporting and governance.

04

Standardized, top-down rollout

One approved curriculum pushed to everyone, managed centrally.

The turn

Where that model runs out

A system of record is excellent at proving completion. It has no answer for engagement, for tacit expertise, or for whether anything actually changed on the job.

01

It tracks completion, not change

For knowledge work a finished course proves nothing. Reviewers consistently describe Workday Learning as a place of record, not a driver of behavior.

02

Admin-heavy and counterintuitive

Simple tasks routinely take extra steps, and admins report needing advanced training just to run basic workflows.

03

Service is consultant-led

Implementation runs through consultants with thin learning-specific documentation, and learning is one small module in a massive suite.

04

Learning isn’t the priority

Inside a $20B+ HR platform, the learner experience competes for roadmap attention it rarely wins.

Here’s the turn

A cleaner system of record is still a system of record. We’re built to change behavior.

Run the two through a compliance checklist and Workday holds its own. But our track doesn’t stay on the records rails. It lifts off into a different category, turning your own experts into a living network of peer learning that measurably changes how the work gets done.

The LMS model
Workday Learning
One system, clean records. A compliance LMS, staying a compliance LMS.
The network model
PlusPlus
Lifts off into a living network, experts teaching peers, behavior that changes.

The market, mapped

Same market. Different job.

Everyone here sells “learning.” Plot them by who they serve and what they actually move, and the overlap thins out. Workday anchors the compliance-and-records corner, tied to the HR suite. PlusPlus sits where tacit expertise meets complex knowledge work.

Standardized, must-pass content → Spreading tacit expertiseFrontline & regulated → Knowledge work on complex systemsDoceboLearnUpon360LearningSana

The different category

Collective intelligence, not a bigger system of record

Your internal experts already hold the answers. PlusPlus turns them into structured peer learning, cohorts, mentorship, guides, and nudges, so knowledge moves between people instead of sitting in a compliance log. That’s a different product, not a module in a suite.

What PlusPlus customers see

40%
monthly opt-in engagement, against an industry standard under 5%
800%
increase in program participation

Where we’re different

Four things that don’t fit in a records system

→ 01

Engagement, not just completion

We instrument opt-in and on-the-job change, not mandatory-completion percentages.

40%
monthly opt-in vs. under 5% industry standard

→ 02

Service that owns the outcome

A named partner helps design, launch, and land the program, not a consultant handoff and a ticket queue.

60 hrs
of admin time saved every month

→ 03

Low admin overhead

Fast, simple workflows instead of multi-step processes that need advanced training to run.

→ 04

Learning is the whole company

Not one module inside an HR suite. Every bit of our roadmap goes to learning enablement.

The comparison, honestly

On paper, it’s a tie. That’s the point.

Both clear the table-stakes bar. So there’s no wall of green checkmarks here, just the genuine parity, stated flatly, and then what’s actually off the chart.

Table stakesPlusPlusWorkday
Course hosting & catalog
SSO, SCORM / xAPI
Compliance & certifications
Completion dashboards
Mobile & AI authoring
Genuine parity. Both platforms clear the bar, which is exactly why the checklist can’t decide this.
Off the chart — only PlusPlus

The things that decide it don’t fit on the checklist.

What actually decides itPlusPlusWorkday
The collective-intelligence network
your experts, connected
Expert-led peer learning
SMEs teach, not just admins
Behavior-change measurement
outcomes, not completions
Program partnership
we own the launch with you
Co-built roadmap
you shape what ships
Service that owns the outcome
a partner, not a tier
Where the decision actually gets made.

Today we launched our annual compliance training for about 8,200 people. We’ve had a handful of tickets, 6 in total, and all of them were resolved in less than a minute. PlusPlus has made it so easy to launch this and manage it. In all my years running this, it has never been this easy.

K

Kate

Lead Instructional Designer, HubSpot